We’ll consider Gorsuch after you consider Merrick Garland
Merrick Garland, President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee. (Whitehouse.gov)
Neal Katyal makes an eloquent case for Neil Gorsuch in the New York Times this week as a highly qualified candidate.
I believe he has strong experience.
Democrats shouldn’t vote for him though. Not yet. Instead, they should demand a vote on Merrick Garland first, because of his similar qualifications.
Why?
Because this fight is bigger than Gorsuch. This fight is about democracy and our Constitution. It’s about fairness under the law, and Garland deserves a Senate hearing and a vote.
